Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mao-Xin Gong vs Jae Hwan Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gong vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Mao-Xin Gong vs Jae Hwan Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gong 1 - 0 Kim
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gong has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kim has won 49.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gong, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 52.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kim winning 69.23% (W/L 9/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 185/ 140), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 17/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 111/ 74).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gong winning 1 times and Kim being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gong winning 2 and Kim winning 1. The last match between Gong and Kim was at the Vietnam F5, 17-09-2012, Second, Hard with Mao-Xin Gong getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gong and Kim have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gong winning 1 times and Kim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gong winning 0, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gong has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kim has played against players with an average rank of 57.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
294
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
794
Rank
794
High
29
Age
L
Plays
Form
55% (212-173)
Career Total W/L
60% (131-87)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
69% (9-4)
$520
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mao-Xin Gong vs Jae Hwan Kim For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gong VS Kim
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Mao-Xin Gong | Jae Hwan Kim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mao-Xin Gong | Jae Hwan Kim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (19/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (140/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:10:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 57.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (282/506) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (189/282) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (110/224) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (18/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (189/482) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Mao-Xin Gong Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Min-Kyu Song
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
10
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
6
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Ollert
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Worarin Kumthonkittikul
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
38%
(
33 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sidharth Rawat
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
80 of
132)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hans Podlipnik-Castillo
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Mies
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
71 of
130)
1st Serve %
54%
(
85 of
158)
19
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
48 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
67 of
158)
149
Total Points Won
139
|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jae Hwan Kim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
64 of
119)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Sung Woo Cho
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Min Hyun Lee
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
William Hsieh
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gong Vs Kim Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gong are available here and Kim photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
